Progress for week 8 (2019)

From Robin

Revision as of 07:53, 28 February 2019 (view source) Wonhol (Talk | contribs) (→David Kolden) ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:57, 28 February 2019 (view source) Wonhol (Talk | contribs) (→Budget) Newer edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:
	* Comparison of the methods		* Comparison of the methods
	* NEAT on CTRNN?		* NEAT on CTRNN?
		+
		+	=== Accounting ===
		+	* Identified 3 mainstream methods - coupled oscillators, CTRNN+GA, indirect encoding(diff. oscillator with CPPN, SUPG - embedded CPPN)
		+	* coupled oscillators implemented with hand tuned parameters, CTRNN+GA seems to be little deprecated(?), CPPN approaches are most recent(2017-2018 Eiben and colleges) and claimed to work better than CTRNN(Morse 2015)
		+	* Written notes on CPG impl. details.

---

Revision as of 22:57, 28 February 2019

Contents 1 David Kolden 1.1 Budget 2 Wonho Lee 2.1 Budget 2.2 Accounting

David Kolden

Budget

• Finish creating helping functionality and do experiment.

Wonho Lee

Budget

• Categorize CPG implementation methods
• Comparison of the methods
• NEAT on CTRNN?

Accounting

• Identified 3 mainstream methods - coupled oscillators, CTRNN+GA, indirect encoding(diff. oscillator with CPPN, SUPG - embedded CPPN)
• coupled oscillators implemented with hand tuned parameters, CTRNN+GA seems to be little deprecated(?), CPPN approaches are most recent(2017-2018 Eiben and colleges) and claimed to work better than CTRNN(Morse 2015)
• Written notes on CPG impl. details.