Progress for week 8 (2019)
From Robin
(Difference between revisions)
(→Budget) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* coupled oscillators implemented with hand tuned parameters, CTRNN+GA seems to be little deprecated(?), CPPN approaches are most recent(2017-2018 Eiben and colleges) and claimed to work better than CTRNN(Morse 2015) | * coupled oscillators implemented with hand tuned parameters, CTRNN+GA seems to be little deprecated(?), CPPN approaches are most recent(2017-2018 Eiben and colleges) and claimed to work better than CTRNN(Morse 2015) | ||
* Written notes on CPG impl. details. | * Written notes on CPG impl. details. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Malin Aandahl == | ||
| + | === Accounting === | ||
| + | - Written a bit on the master thesis. | ||
| + | - Made progress on 3rd fitness function; | ||
| + | - Printed out bounding box into file. | ||
Revision as of 06:28, 1 March 2019
Contents |
David Kolden
Budget
- Finish creating helping functionality and do experiment.
Wonho Lee
Budget
- Categorize CPG implementation methods
- Comparison of the methods
- NEAT on CTRNN?
Accounting
- Identified 3 mainstream methods - coupled oscillators, CTRNN+GA, indirect encoding(diff. oscillator with CPPN, SUPG - embedded CPPN)
- coupled oscillators implemented with hand tuned parameters, CTRNN+GA seems to be little deprecated(?), CPPN approaches are most recent(2017-2018 Eiben and colleges) and claimed to work better than CTRNN(Morse 2015)
- Written notes on CPG impl. details.
Malin Aandahl
Accounting
- Written a bit on the master thesis. - Made progress on 3rd fitness function;
- Printed out bounding box into file.
